Writing An Abstract For An Essay

Writing An Abstract For An Essay-59
Abstract 1 is ineffective because it is almost all trees and no forest.Indeed, its opening acknowledgment of the forest does not do much more than restate the essay’s title.

Abstract 1 is ineffective because it is almost all trees and no forest.Indeed, its opening acknowledgment of the forest does not do much more than restate the essay’s title.

Rather than assuming that the analysis of the case studies is a worthwhile project, it focuses on articulating its worth.

The abstract itself does not provide sufficient grounds for an editor or reviewer to decide that the essay should be published, (after all, the execution of the argument sketched in the essay could be unsuccessful), but it is likely to make those readers interested in examining that execution.

The two abstracts handle those case studies in very different ways.

Abstract 1: This essay demonstrates how Atul Gawande uses stories in the service of his arguments in two of his essays, “On Washing Hands” from (2014).

In both essays, Gawande works with a problem-solution argumentative structure and uses narrative to complicate that structure.

In “On Washing Hands,” he does not construct a straightforward argument with a straightforward thesis.In that way, an ineffective abstract becomes an obstacle that your article needs to overcome.How do you produce a good abstract for this audience?Abstract 2: This essay responds to scholarly skepticism about narrative as argument, due to its reliance on hindsight effects (because such and such happened, then so and so must be the causes), and its tendency to develop inadequate analogies or to overgeneralize from single cases.The essay contends that, while some uses of narrative as argument display these problems, they are not inherent in narrative itself.A good abstract tilts them toward an affirmative answer by leaving them well-disposed toward the longer argument in the article.A bad abstract won’t by itself cause this audience to reject an article, but it does incline the audience toward an initial negative answer.Its fundamental flaw is its unexamined assumption that each of its two cases studies is in itself a significant contribution to conversations about the relation between narrative and argument.Abstract 2 is much more effective because it backgrounds the trees and foregrounds the forest. ” question, it explicitly announces its methodological commitment (to a conception of “narrative as rhetoric”), and it clearly states its conclusions in a way that situates them in the larger debate.It offers warrants for that contention by (a) proposing a conception of narrative as rhetoric and (b) using that conception to analyze two essays by Atul Gawande, “On Washing Hands” (2007) and “Letting Go” (2014), which rely heavily on narrative as part of their larger problem-solution argumentative structure.The analysis leads to the conclusion that a skillful author can, depending on his or her overall purposes, use narrative either as a mode of argument in itself or as a means of supporting arguments made through non-narrative means -- and can even use both approaches within a single piece. Abstract 1 adopts the strategy of offering a general statement about the larger argument and focusing on what the essay says about the case studies.

SHOW COMMENTS

Comments Writing An Abstract For An Essay

The Latest from granarts.ru ©