"I think it would be helpful for the public to see what scientists are actually saying about these topics, rather than just believe stereotypes," she said.Tags: Writing Names Of Books In EssaysBlank Writing Paper With Picture BoxNew Technology Argumentative EssayLevel Coursework ChemistryGcse English Non Fiction CourseworkFormat Of Literature Review For ThesisDescriptive Essays On DogsMy Name Is Earl Creative Writing
Other findings: • Scientists as a whole are substantially different from the American public in how they view teaching "intelligent design" in public schools.
Nearly all of the scientists religious and nonreligious alike have a negative impression of the theory of intelligent design.
That disbelief in God is just as much a matter of faith as belief in God can only be a stale platitude from Mc Grath given his failure to even superficially survey the best arguments for atheism.
Mc Grath does address, however, four charges made by Richard Dawkins against religion, including the charge that evolution makes God unnecessary as an explanation and that religion is a source of much of the misery in the world.
Our study found that many people have much more nuanced views." These nuanced views often find their way into the classroom, according to those interviewed.
One biologist, an atheist not part of any religious tradition, admitted that she makes a sincere effort to present science such that "religious students do not need to compromise their own selves." Although she is not reconsidering her personal views on religion, she seeks out resources to keep her religious students engaged with science.
• Overall, under some circumstances even the most religious of scientists were described in very positive terms by their nonreligious peers; this suggests that the integration of religion and science is not so distasteful to all scientists.
Ecklund said the study's findings will go far in improving the public's perception of science.
The study showed that these individuals generally have a particular kind of religion in mind (and religious people and institutions) when they say that religion and science are in conflict.
The study identified three strategies of action used by these scientists to manage the religion-science boundaries and the circumstances that the two could overlap.