If Britain had given the colonists representatives in Parliament it would have appeased them and a huge conflict might not have occurred.
The irony was that British representatives could have easily outvoted the Colonial representatives in Parliament.
The colonists set up a Non-importation agreement in order to protest the excessive taxes the In 1765 the Stamp Act mandated the use of stamps on certain types of commercial and legal documents.
The purpose of this tax was to raise revenue for the new military force, but the colonists did not want to pay for an army they did not ask for.
Becker's and at least mentioned by the other writers.
But while the assertion of the natural rights of man could far better stir the passions than mere legal and constitutional differences, there was still a vital missing link: for how many colonists indeed sat down to read the abstract philosophy of John Locke?
The Quartering Act required colonists to provide housing for British troops which was uncomfortable for the colonists because they did not want Redcoats in their homes.
The historian must be more than a chronicler, a mere lister of events.
What, then, were the basic and overarching causes of the American Revolution?
The older view, dominant in the first two or three decades of the twentieth century, laid greatest emphasis on the conflict of constitutional ideas, on the fact that the American colonists saw the actions of Great Britain after 1763 as interfering with their constitutional rights While constitutional interpretations and conflicts played a role, the entire emphasis came to seem to historians—and properly so—to be stodgy and unsatisfactory: for what event as wrenching and even cataclysmic as a revolution is ever launched on the basis of mere legalisms, and legalisms that were often dubious at that?