Stanford Prison Experiment Research Paper

Stanford Prison Experiment Research Paper-11
Although there were none of the prisoners had any long term effects from participating, while in the experiment they would be harassed and punished for no reason, which is where I think the experiment should have been discontinued.Control of the experiment was lost as everybody involved, including Zimbardo became completely engulfed in their roles of the prison.

Tags: It Research PaperBusiness Plan DubaiDeloitte Case Study ConsultingResearch Papers Cameron Auto PartsDissertation Completion SEssay 2012 Scholarship

The experiment simulated a real life scenario of William Golding’s novel, “Lord of the Flies” showing a decay and failure of traditional rules and morals; distracting exactly how people should behave toward one another.

This To ensure to have satisfactory results in his study, Zimbardo required some preconditions.

The Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE) was a social psychology experiment that attempted to investigate the psychological effects of perceived power, focusing on the struggle between prisoners and prison officers.

It was conducted at Stanford University on the days of August 14–20, 1971, by a research group led by psychology professor Philip Zimbardo using college students.

I know I would, but learning about the Stanford Prison Experiment has made me question what would really happen if I was there.

Would I be the submissive prisoner, the sadistic guard, or would I stay true to myself?Having [our] participants live in that setting day and night, if prisoners, or work for long eight-hour shifts, if guards, would also allow sufficient time for situational norms to develop and patters of social interaction to emerge, change and become crystallized” (Zimbardo, 2013).Other preconditions he had were the mentalities of his volunteers; are they “normal,” healthy mentally and physically, are they without any prior history of conviction or drug usage?A group of researchers, headed by Stanford University psychologist Philip G.Zimbardo, designed and executed an unusual experiment that used a mock prison setting, with college students role-playing either as prisoners or guards to test the power of the social situation to determine psychological effects and behavior (1971).Research was conducted recently (August 14-21, 1971) in which subjects assumed the roles of ‘prisoner’ or ‘guard’ for an extended period of time within an experimentally devised mock prison setting on the Stanford University campus.The projected twoweek study had to be prematurely terminated when it became apparent that many of the ‘prisoners’ were in serious distress and many of the ‘guards’ were behaving in ways which brutalized and degraded their fellow subjects. To begin the experiment I believe that although valuable information came from it, the ethical quality of this experiment is very questionable.I suspected that the guards would turn more authoritative than any of them would have in real life, but I never thought that they would go as far as ridiculing some prisoners to tears.This really makes me question Zimbardo and the other researchers to how they could be too involved in their own experiment to stop the experiment when it began to grow out of control.I think that in the experiment the guards showed who they really were.


Comments Stanford Prison Experiment Research Paper

The Latest from ©