Tags: Essay Importance Of Science In Day To Day LifePersuasive Essay WriterMba Objectives EssayDoctoral Dissertation On EducationMoney Brings Happiness EssaysDescriptive Essay New CarSpring CourseworkPower Of Words EssayEssay On Corruption In Higher Education
For the fourth year in a row, ISACA has surveyed security leaders worldwide to determine their insights and experiences with key cybersecurity issues, ranging from workforce challenges and opportunities to the emerging threat landscape.
ISR information and imagery is collected through surveillance and reconnaissance sensors. Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) systems also rely on satellite-based ‘beyond-line-of-sight’ communication. In addition to the abundance of capabilities, it is noteworthy that the capabilities are also linked and therefore affecting one capability may cause collateral effects on others.
As explained in the Space Threat Assessment 2018 published by the Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), there are several intrusion points for space-based assets: antennas on satellites and ground stations, landlines that connect ground stations to terrestrial networks, and user terminals that connect to satellites.
NATO by itself does not own satellites, but is dependent on member states.
In case of need, NATO requests access to products and services from the allies.
This indeed would be a big step towards focusing more on space-based assets and their vulnerabilities.
Considering the current context, in which China and Russia are increasing their presence in space, this action by NATO is inevitable.State of Cybersecurity 2019, Part 1, examines workforce issues and security budgets.State of Cybersecurity 2019, Part 2, looks at current attack trends and governance.In addition, ensuring the security of space capabilities is mostly in the hands of the allies.This puts NATO into a position where its main option to protect capabilities of vital importance is to encourage allies to put effort into securing the space-based assets and foster cooperation in space-based systems cyber security. During the Brussels Summit in 2018, the Alliance recognised space as a ‘highly dynamic and rapidly evolving area, which is essential to a coherent Alliance deterrence and defence posture’ and on 27 June 2019, it approved new space policy.The question of supply chain was raised in the Livingstone and Lewis 2016 report, which observed that there was no coherent global organisation with regard to cyber security in space and that existing approaches had only limited reach into the supply chain.In this year’s research paper, it is again stressed that when the supply chain does not ensure that military security standards are met, items procured may expose NATO systems to vulnerabilities.As the dependence of military operations on space-based assets has increased exponentially over the last few decades and space-based assets are potential targets for cyber attack, the newly released Chatham House research paper ‘Cybersecurity of NATO’s Space-based Strategic Assets‘ suggests that NATO should bring space more to the spotlight.The research paper lists cyber threats to space-based strategic assets and capabilities, analyses capability requirements and gives concrete recommendations for ways improve the resilience of the space-based systems.The research paper also highlights the aspect of NATO’s dependency on member states for communication capacity as a possible source of vulnerabilities.NATO owns satellite communications (SATCOM) ground stations, but no satellites; it is therefore highly reliant on allies to provide space-sourced data, information and services.