Also, the results showed that Nigerian political cartoons set social agenda by mainly encapsulating current and sensitive issues that people are much concerned about.Finally, the study has identified the lack of supportive and clearly defined theoretical background in analyzing political cartoons as a major problem in previous cartoons research.
Also, the results showed that Nigerian political cartoons set social agenda by mainly encapsulating current and sensitive issues that people are much concerned about.Finally, the study has identified the lack of supportive and clearly defined theoretical background in analyzing political cartoons as a major problem in previous cartoons research.But he later withdrew, saying that the replication would benefit from a division of labour, and Ursula Hess, a psychologist at Humboldt University of Berlin, vetted the study’s procedures instead.Tags: Persuasive Speeches On Cyber BullyingFamous Essayist And Their WorksBeing Rich Is A State Of Mind EssayWays Of Organizing A Research PaperTemplate For Writing A Research PaperDiscriptive Essay WritingTheme Essays On Of A SalesmanThesis On FilmThe Alchemyst Book Report
Unlike in the 1988 study, the experimenters used a video camera to record the participants in order to exclude those not holding the pen correctly, which could have made them self-conscious and suppressed their emotional responses.
And Strack says that The Far Side cartoons may have been dated or inappropriate for the participants, who were university students in multiple countries.
This paper aims at illustrating how political cartoons are used as a vehicle of setting social agenda in Nigerian newspapers to reorient and shape the public opinion through recurrent depictions mirroring current socio-political issues at a given period.
The cartoons texts were excerpted from two major Nigerian newspapers, Daily Trust and Vanguard during the period 2007-2010.
Overall, the experiments found no difference in the way people with pen-induced smiles or frowns rated the cartoons.
And 16 of the experiments tested enough people for there to be statistical confidence that even if the studies had been repeated many more times, the researchers would have found the same null result, says Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, a psychologist at the University of Amsterdam who led the analysis. , which was published along with the replication study, in which he argued that the studies may have been affected by two potential shortcomings.Specifically, content analysis was used to identify the themes contained in the cartoons depictions.Qualitative method was used to analyze the cartoons through semiotic analysis.Last year, hundreds of psychologists reported attempts to replicate the findings of 98 papers, and said that they could validate fewer than half of them.Like some other replication efforts, Wagenmakers’ project had its protocol vetted — and published details of that protocol — before the independent validation studies began.Thus, this paper contributes to the cartoon research by offering theoretical insight to the cartoon genre through agenda setting theory of media effect.A large, multi-lab replication study has found no evidence to validate one of psychology’s textbook findings: the idea that people find cartoons funnier if they are surreptitiously induced to smile.If he were to test facial feedback again, he says, he wouldn’t use the pen experiment — the Botox study, for example, may be a better test.The study is one of several multi-lab efforts to replicate psychology findings, after the field was rocked by high-profile accusations of fraud and faulty statistical analyses.The analysis is mainly concerned with the interpretation of the sign system based on the connotation and denotation elements in the cartoons.The results indicated that 80% of the themes focused on substantive issues through which social agenda is set to reflect social practices in the Nigerian social political contexts.