China, for example, gives its researchers cash for publishing, especially in influential journals, and perhaps as a result, it also hosts a disproportionate number of hyperprolific authors. It’s not just publish or perish; it’s publish and flourish. A: In most scientific disciplines, there are strict criteria that you need to contribute to the paper in some way.
That could mean actually writing it, coming up with the idea for the study, performing an experiment, and/or helping to interpret the results.
Q: Do some disciplines have more hyperprolific authors than others?
A: About half of the authors we found were in the medical and life sciences. One is that the norms of these disciplines seem to either encourage, or at least condone, adding your name as an author even if you weren’t substantially involved.
In top most journal, once you submit it take around 5-6 months for reviewing.
Like Stephen Kings of academia, some researchers are unusually prolific publishers, appearing as an author on as many as 72 scientific papers a year—or about every 5 days.Another is that some fields like epidemiology collect large amounts of data and dole out their analyses one paper at a time, allowing authors to rack up a large number of publications from a single project. A: I don’t think they are doing so with ill intent.It’s more that the standards have become lax within many fields.According to an estimate, more than 70,000 research journals exist, growing at a rate of about 3.5% per year.More than 1,000 new journals were launched in 2014 alone.When a paper is accepted for publication (upon completing the peer review process through Scholar One Manuscripts), an electronic version of the manuscript will be requested for use in editing and typesetting.Manuscripts should be submitted in Word or La Tex (changes as per journal).A: In some cases, it’s the fear of publishing or perishing, or a desire to win more grant money.But in other cases, there are more direct financial incentives.Did most of them just contribute a comma or a period?We need a system that better recognizes and gives credit for the real work those scientists are doing. A: I’m not reaching the productivity peaks of the scientists included in this analysis, but I do consider myself someone who publishes lots of papers. This means there are around 30,000 people who have higher peaks than me, out of about 20 million scientists who have published at least one paper.