Pros On Abortion Essay

Pros On Abortion Essay-33
"Zygote" is the name of the first cell formed at conception, the earliest developmental stage of the human embryo, followed by the "Morula" and "Blastocyst" stages.[4] Is it human? Is it just a cell or is it an actual organism, a "being? You should raise them, and then provide the answers.The zygote is composed of human DNA and other human molecules, so its nature is undeniably human and not some other species.If the medicine and science don't persuade your audience, consider citing authorities from the "pro-choice"[20] community itself.

"Zygote" is the name of the first cell formed at conception, the earliest developmental stage of the human embryo, followed by the "Morula" and "Blastocyst" stages.[4] Is it human? Is it just a cell or is it an actual organism, a "being? You should raise them, and then provide the answers.The zygote is composed of human DNA and other human molecules, so its nature is undeniably human and not some other species.If the medicine and science don't persuade your audience, consider citing authorities from the "pro-choice"[20] community itself.

Tags: Online Essay CompetitionWatson-Glaser Ii Critical Thinking Appraisal Sample QuestionsTourism Business PlanWhat Is The Definition Of Creative WritingThe Art Of Problem Solving Volume 1Starting An Argumentative Essay With A Quote

Their argument is not about when life begins but about when, or whether, that life deserves legal acknowledgment and protection. Arguing from the Law Most people do not really know what the Supreme Court decided on January 22, 1973.

They assume that the Court made abortion legal in the first trimester of pregnancy only, and that it is subject to substantial limits and regulations today.

The new human zygote has a genetic composition that is absolutely unique from itself, different from any other human that has ever existed, including that of its mother (thus disproving the claim that what is involved in abortion is merely "a woman and her body").[5] This DNA includes a complete "design," guiding not only early development but even hereditary attributes that will appear in childhood and adulthood, from hair and eye color to personality traits.[6] It is also quite clear that the earliest human embryo is biologically alive.

It fulfills the four criteria needed to establish biological life: metabolism, growth, reaction to stimuli, and reproduction.[7] Finally, is the human zygote merely a new kind of cell or is it a human organism; that is, a human being?

Today, parents can see the development of their children with their own eyes.

The obstetric ultra-sound done typically at 20 weeks gestation provides not only pictures but a real-time video of the active life of the child in the womb: clasping his hands, sucking his thumb, yawning, stretching, getting the hiccups, covering his ears to a loud sound nearby[17] -- even smiling.[18] Medicine, too, confirms the existence of the child before birth as a distinct human person.Fetal surgery has become a medical specialty, and includes the separate provision of anesthesia to the baby.You can cite some of the surgeries now performed on children before their birth, such as shunting to bypass an obstructed urinary tract, removal of tumors at the base of the tailbone, and treatment of congenital heart disease.[19] There are many others.Cite the Facts Here is a thumbnail sketch of the scientific evidence of the existence of human life before birth.These are irrefutable facts, about which there is no dispute in the scientific community.[3] At the moment when a human sperm penetrates a human ovum, or egg, generally in the upper portion of the Fallopian Tube, a new entity comes into existence.Arguing from Science The "classic" arguments from the other side are collapsing under the weight of science."No one knows when life begins" and "It's a blob of tissue" are frankly on the wane, especially in the context of surgical abortion, which is how the vast majority of abortions are done today.[2] Still, establishing the evidence of the beginnings of human life will ground your argumentation in science, giving you a firm foundation for additional arguments and preempting the charge that you are basing your position on faith or religious belief.But in May 2009, for the first time, a significantly greater percentage of Americans self-identified as "pro-life" than "pro-choice."[28] Be prepared to cite these and other public opinion polls from various organizations (the last bullet point is crucial, it means only a small minority of Americans agree with Roe): One of the best surveys to have in your arsenal was conducted by the Center for Gender Equality, run by former Planned Parenthood President Faye Wattleton.Its 2003 nationwide survey of women revealed that a majority of women (51%) believe abortion should either never be permitted or permitted only for rape, incest, or life endangerment.[33] That means a majority of women believe abortion should be permitted only in extremely rare circumstances.This coordinated behavior is the very hallmark of an organism.[9] By contrast, while a mere collection of human cells may carry on the activities of cellular life, it will not exhibit coordinated interactions directed towards a higher level of organization.[10] Thus, the scientific evidence is quite plain: at the moment of fusion of human sperm and egg, a new entity comes into existence which is distinctly human, alive, and an individual organism - a living, and fully human, being.[11] Some defenders of abortion will concede the scientific proofs but will argue that the entity in the womb is still not, or not yet, a "person." "Not a person" is a decidedly unscientific argument: it has nothing to do with science and everything to do with someone's own moral or political philosophy, though that someone may not readily admit it. If the science on when life begins is clear, why do some organizations claim that "pregnancy" doesn't begin until a week later, at implantation? Acceptance of an implantation-based definition of "pregnancy" would allow abortion providers to mischaracterize pills and technologies that work after conception but before implantation as "contraception," making them potentially less subject to regulation and certainly more accept-able and attractive to consumers.Here is a good time to recite the scientific proofs, and maybe make a philosophical point of your own: We're either persons or property; and even the staunchest abortion defender will be reluctant to call a human child a piece of property.[12] Others may suggest "humanness" depends on something spiritual, like infusion of a soul, but to argue there is no soul until birth or some other time is, by definition, to argue something incapable of proof. A brief word about the politicization of the definition of "pregnancy." While the science on when life begins is clear, some still claim that "pregnancy" doesn't begin until the embryo implants itself in the lining of the uterine wall, which occurs about a week later. Indeed, two institutes who support legalized abortion have pushed for this type of pregnancy re-definition for decades: the Guttmacher Institute (the abortion research institute originally established by the Planned Parenthood Federation of America) and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

SHOW COMMENTS

Comments Pros On Abortion Essay

The Latest from granarts.ru ©