Tags: Phd Dissertation SociologyWhy Did The Armada Fail EssayUc Berkeley Application EssayArgumentative Essay About Cosmetic SurgerySuny Old Westbury Application EssayHow To Write A Conclusion On An EssayWhy Are You In College EssayBusiness Plan CreationDo Your Own HomeworkGun Shop Business Plan
ur political debates about stem cell research in recent years have stood in a peculiar relation to public opinion.
Even fewer backed the creation of embryos for research purposes.
In other words, there was not great support for the essential prerequisites for embryo research.
The survey involved 1,003 American adults, and has a margin of error of /- 3.1%. asily the most unusual and outstanding characteristic of public views on the stem cell and embryo research issues is a self-reported lack of familiarity with the facts.
In other arenas of policy and politics, even when people don’t know much about a prominent public subject they tend not to perceive or report their own ignorance.
This lack of basic knowledge and confidence means that people are uncertain of the facts and the issues at stake, so that how the subject is framed makes an enormous difference in shaping judgments about policy preferences.
Persuasive Essay Stem Cell Research
For instance, when presented as a very general matter, stem cell research is quite popular.Asked, for instance, whether adult or embryonic stem cell research had yielded any therapeutic results, only 23% of respondents answered correctly that, to date, only adult stem cells have resulted in treatments for disease.More respondents wrongly believed that embryonic stem cells had already yielded therapies, and many wrongly believed that neither adult nor embryonic stem cells had done so.PERSON 2: It is unethical to destroy human embryos for the purposes of research because doing so destroys human embryos that are human beings and could otherwise have developed and grown like every other human being.Interestingly, when the embryo question was presented in the context of the various uses of in vitro fertilization (IVF) — that is, the context of what is done with human embryos once they’re created in the lab — fewer than 40% of respondents supported even the freezing of embryos for later use.In all of these scenarios, the American public is taken to be moved by clear and strong opinions on the vexed questions of stem cell research, human cloning, and related practices just past the horizon.But attempts to actually study these views, and to pin down the meaning of the large majorities cited by the various parties to the political arguments, have been vanishingly rare.“By the latest poll,” Senator Dianne Feinstein (D.-Cal.) told her colleagues on the Senate floor in 2006, “72 percent of Americans support stem cell research.” Her colleague Senator Sam Brownback (R.-Kans.), meanwhile, argued in the same debate that a large majority of Americans oppose all human cloning.The Coalition for the Advancement of Medical Research argues that seven in ten Americans want to eliminate restrictions on public funding of embryonic stem cell research, while the Conference of Catholic Bishops points to a poll showing six in ten oppose such funding altogether.Switching topics now, as you may know, in vitro fertilization, or IVF, is the process of creating human embryos in a laboratory, by combining a sperm and an egg.The process results in a human embryo which can then be implanted in a mother’s womb to develop to birth, frozen for later transfer to a mother, or discarded or used for research purposes (and then destroyed).