The concept of heroism is considered to be one of the most disputable questions for a long period of time.
Different people offer their own interpretations of this word and use various examples to prove the positions chosen.
Whereas the shaping of Gilgamesh allowed the authors to give it an additional meaning, the ability to control over his own life turns Batman into a commodity, something meant for consumption.
In Frank Miller’s , there was a limit to which Miller felt he could re-imagine Batman and a limit to which the reader would accept from him as a character.
What the reader may rely upon nowadays is several versions that are considered to be the product of multiple authors’ works, which are refined into meaningful versions with an intrinsic message to be delivered to the audience.
So, the character of Gilgamesh becomes a kind of a tool to attract the reader and prove its urgency in modern society.
Any new version is automatically filtered through what we know about Batman, and the “re-imagining” must continue to exist within the same basic space that the character has been in for the cultural memory of its reader.
Batman fans know already what to expect from the story.
Batman is inspired to be a hero in order to stop other people from experiencing what he experienced, whereas Gilgamesh was imposing his violent will on his subjects at the beginning of the story.
As a result of such differences, the fans of the Batman character has the required portion of control over live in such a way that the original audience of Gilgamesh never did.