Tags: Christopher Columbus American History EssayCollege Application Essays That WorkedPsychometric Properties Of The California Critical Thinking TestsWay To Save Money EssayPediatrician Cover Letter For ResumeBusiness Education Lesson Plans For High SchoolBusiness Plan For An It CompanyDescription Of A Person Essay
Theory (the new contributions that you are adding to the body of knowledge) and 3. The duration of the defense might just be 10 - 15 minutes, as such the questioners will not have the time to ask you about every detail. If you could change something regarding your study, what would it be? What questions do you have for us You can ask them if there any revisions they want you to make in your report.
This is where you talk about the importance and implications of your findings from three levels namely: 1.
Research (various ways other researchers can improve or refine the study) 2.
Then, discuss with your advisor how to best address these concerns.
(Your advisor cannot tell you the specific questions the examiners will ask, but s/he can direct your attention to issues or areas that require some thinking or additional research.) 20.
Many Ph Ders are surprised to find themselves immersed in a far more generalist (albeit still highly professional) conversation than they had initially anticipated.
To prepare effectively for the big day and avoid being blind-sided you may need to change mindset a lot.Therefore, don’t use too many jargons and don’t pack it with details. For example, you should not spend more than 5 minutes on introduction, since you are allowed only 20 minutes for your presentation. Most of the questions are rather general and broad, dealing with substantial methodological, theoretical and application issues.You need to tell people in simple, concise language: 11. However, some questions focus on specific points regarding sampling, statistical analysis, or some questionable conclusions. Be prepared to clarify or elaborate on your assumptions, theoretical positions, methods, and conclusions.Use the following steps when preparing for the oral defense of your thesis/dissertation. Evaluation of oral examination is based on your presentation and your answers to questions from the examining committee. Be well prepared for your presentation—academically, mentally and physically.Try to be well rested and focused before your oral defense. In your preparation, don’t try to memorize all the studies cited in your thesis, but you do need to know the details of the few key studies that form the basis of your investigation. You need to be familiar with larger issues, such as the basic assumptions, theoretical framework, paradigm, cross-cultural perspectives, Christian integration, etc. More importantly, you need to have a deep understanding of the nature of your research problem and the major issues involved. You may bring with you important materials for easy reference in the course of your defense; these may include key articles, computer print-outs of results, etc. Your presentation is evaluated in terms of content and clarity as well as style. Don’t speak too fast and don’t read from your notes. Treat your presentation as a public address because there may be non-psychologists present at your defense.Note: Avoid the temptation to make recommendations that are not supported by your findings. In a project defense you are expected to: - Present yourself as a scholar in the discipline and an authority on your subject.- Cogently and clearly explain your work.- Have a conversation with the panel of assessors.- Defend any idea that might be disagreed upon. Have a thorough understanding of the nature of your research problem. Make eye contact with more than one member of the panel of assessors during the course of your presentation.5. When you have finally finished writing a Ph D dissertation or thesis, and submitted it to the university for review, you are at the end of a long period of grappling with dozens of tricky and detailed problems and issues.Often, an examiner plays the devil’s advocate to see how well you can think on your feet and defend yourself. Occasionally, an examiner may ask a question which is unfair or cannot be adequately answered.After a few futile attempts, feel free to say that you don’t know the answer. It is perfectly acceptable to think for a couple of seconds, or ask if you are on the right track. A good defense means that you can provide strong logical arguments as well as empirical support o defend your position or conclusion.During the defense, the panel of assessors will ask you questions to test your knowledge of the research subject matter, depth of your work, the results and conclusions you arrived at. Talk about the research problem you wanted to address which made you embark on the study. Briefly, explain what your research project is all about? What is the scope of the study Here you briefly state the specific aspects of your project topic that was covered. Talk about the data collection methods and sampling techniques employed in the research. For example, if you used the survey research method, you can state reasons such as: no interviewer bias, cost-effective, it enabled you (the researcher) to collect information from the sample without influencing the population of the study e.t.c 9. To answer this question, simply tell your audience/panel of assessors that the threats to research reliability (which are participants error, participant bias, research error, and researcher bias) did not occur during the research. To answer this question, simply tell your audience/panel of assessors that the findings from your study can be generalized to other relevant settings, group or case study. In what way(s) does your research project contributes to knowledge?The questions that would be asked will fall within these four categories: -What is your research project about? To respond to this question, you need to fully understand your research project. Or you can simply say that you made sure the threats were reduced to the barest minimum. This question is similar to your significance of the study.