Tags: What Is A Literature Review PaperThesis On Procurement In GhanaSpace Boiology EssayHow Many Page Is A 700 Word EssayPsychology Thesis AutismTerm Paper On Bayesian ReasoningPros Cons Social Networking Sites EssayResearch Papers On Software EngineeringDoes And Essay Have ParagraphsHow To Start An Introduction For A Research Paper
The editor has sought your opinion and wants to know exactly what you think, so be clear and as decisive as possible.• Never forget that you are also an author whose writing undergoes peer review.
• Most peer reviews are blind, which is to say that the author will not know the identity of the reviewer, but even if this policy is not in place, avoid personal remarks and personal details in your review report.
• Suggestions for improvements should certainly be offered, but within reason.
Ultimately, what you’re doing is making a recommendation to the editor, who may or may not have the expertise required to evaluate the work being done.
If you’re lucky, your advisor will guide you through this process.
Basing your evaluation and recommendation on selfish or unethical reasons such as prejudices, personal grudges or a desire to dominate your field is always inappropriate.
• Do not close your review with vague or uncertain recommendations.• Once you accept an invitation, do not neglect to plan ahead so that you allow sufficient time to do the review well and send your report to the editor by the deadline.If at any point it becomes clear that you will not be able to do the review in time, do not delay informing the editor. • Even if you run short on time, do not rush your review and write an inadequate report.Whether you are preparing a conference paper for presentation or publication, polishing a professional report to share with your colleagues, or tackling the daunting task of editing and perfecting any kind of academic or scientific document, a qualified member of our expert team can provide invaluable assistance and give you greater confidence in your written work.Our translation services for scientific and academic documents have also proven immensely helpful for many of our international clients.It is unethical to use your position as a reviewer in order to force authors to cite your publications. As a scientific reviewer you will read many papers that approach and discuss issues in ways that you might not, and even papers that come to conclusions that contradict your own research and writing.The question is whether the research is valid and the paper makes an impact, not whether you like that impact or not.This can be a stressful question for early career scientists who aren’t very confident in their own abilities yet. Herendeen says, “if it is a reputable journal, the editor has probably spent some time investigating potential reviewers and thinks you have relevant background.” So to some extent, you can consider the invitation itself a vote of confidence.“If you are not certain whether you have the background, you can always ask the editor for clarification.• Although you should give serious thought to whether you can do a review or not, do not unnecessarily delay your response to an editor’s invitation to peer review an article.Time is pressing and the publication process takes long enough even when everyone is as efficient as possible.