The original inspiration of Arendt’s last work, showed that thinking could not have served as a moral safeguard in the history of Nazism.
The original inspiration of Arendt’s last work, showed that thinking could not have served as a moral safeguard in the history of Nazism.Tags: Rumpelstiltskin Moral Value EssayNewsweek Article On College EssaysHow Do You Write A Quote In An EssayArt And Critical ThinkingHow To Write A Graduate School EssayEconomics Research PaperHome Based Bakery Business PlanBusiness Plan Budget Template Excel
He claimed that they have turned the state of emergency—or “state of exception” as he called it—into a habit.
Instead of introducing emergency policies, which curb the rights and freedoms of their citizens, only in exceptional cases, to deal with exceptional crises, they have come to use them routinely.
She defined it as “a novel form of government”—an unprecedented political regime, a historically new system of politics. It was their most critical crisis, their most exceptional exception.
This essay explores Arendt’s understanding of this supremely critical exception.
Arendt posited that they are “autonomous;” that is: “they cannot be derived from each other and …
cannot be reduced to a common denominator.” Nor do they possess obvious causes.
This essay thus argues that Arendt’s philosophical thinking—her conceptions of thinking and of judgment—clashed with her understanding of history, and this conflict disorganized her views on morality in the time of the modern West’s greatest crisis. “The immediate impulse” that gave rise to her “preoccupation with mental activities,” she explained, “came from [her] attending the Eichmann trial.” In Israel, her “interest” was “awakened” by what she thought was the most striking feature of the accused—his “thoughtlessness,” a blatant “absence of thinking” both “in his past behavior [and] in his behavior during the trial.” Faced with this emptiness of mind, Arendt wondered whether there might be a link between human thinking and evil.
“Could the activity of thinking as such,” she asked herself, “the habit of examining whatever happens to come to pass or to attract attention, regardless of results and specific content, could this activity be among the conditions that make men abstain from evil-doing or even actually ‘condition’ them against it?
Following 9/11, Giorgio Agamben theorized states of emergency in his philosophical essay .
Agamben articulated a critique of Western democracies.