Dissertation Discussion And Conclusion

Dissertation Discussion And Conclusion-73
If you have unexpected findings, try to interpret them in terms of method, interpretation, even a restructured hypothesis; in extreme cases, you may have to rewrite your introduction. Previous reports of smooth tonotopic maps may have resulted from techniques that average the responses over multiple neurons.

If you have unexpected findings, try to interpret them in terms of method, interpretation, even a restructured hypothesis; in extreme cases, you may have to rewrite your introduction. Previous reports of smooth tonotopic maps may have resulted from techniques that average the responses over multiple neurons.

Tags: How To Write Review Paper For JournalNational French Week EssayThesis Master Of Business AdministrationMethodology In Thesis WritingVideo Game Center Business PlanTherese Raquin Essay Questions

Specifically, at short distances we observed both very large and very small correlations, while at longer distances we observed only smaller correlations..., the strong correlation between the signal correlation of pairs of neurons (generally attributed to common input), and the noise correlation between them (generally attributed to direct synaptic connections) of strongly coupled subnetworks that share common input.

Such a model, with partially overlapping, strongly connected subnetworks that share common input, has already been suggested for L2/3 neurons in the visual cortex Different experimental procedures, including direct mappings of synaptic connectivity in local cortical circuits, would be required to reveal the underlying organizational principles of the auditory cortex.

These should be the first two pieces of information the reader encounters.

How similar or variable are the response properties of neighboring neurons in A1?

The solution that has evolved over time is to set up the Discussion section as a "dialogue" between Results and Theories -- yours and everyone elses'.

In other words, for every experimental result you want to talk about, you find results from other publications bearing the relationship to your result that you want the reader to understand.This section describes the main elements of a written thesis for the Norwegian bachelor’s and master’s degrees.Although the organising principles described here are most clearly relevant for empirical theses, much of the advice is also relevant for theoretical work.Results can take the form of data, hypotheses, models, definitions, formulas, etc.(I imagine the Results section like a dance with swords -- sometimes you are engaging your partner with the pointy end and sometimes you are gliding along side them).Are there any obvious organizational principles in local populations?And to what extent are the responses of individual neurons in the network independent or correlated?The discussion section is a framing section, like the Introduction, which returns to the significance argument set up in your introduction.So reread your introduction carefully before writing the discussion; you will discuss how the hypothesis has been demonstrated by the new research and then show how the field's knowledge has been changed by the addition of this new data.: In vivo two-photon calcium imaging enabled us to characterize the functional architecture of neuronal populations in layer 2/3 of the mouse primary auditory cortex with high precision. Tonotopy and gradual decrease of signal correlation with distance were found when examining larger distances.It thus seems that local heterogeneity is embedded in larger-scale order in A1.

SHOW COMMENTS

Comments Dissertation Discussion And Conclusion

The Latest from granarts.ru ©